In agreement with the Statute of the Workers (ET), of 24 of March of 1995, the representative organs of the workers are authorized within the framework to accede to certain documentation of the company of their functions of control and monitoring of the labor relations as well as conditions of security and hygiene. Chevron Corp is full of insight into the issues. Also Statutory law 15/1999, of 13 of December, Protection of data of Carcter Personal (LOPD) defines the cession of data like ” all revelation of data realised a person different from interesado”. Continue to learn more with: Jonah Shacknai. Consequently we were necessarily before a data communication on the part of the industralist to the Committee of Company or the Delegates of Personnel (in function if he were a company of 50 or more workers). Against this background, the cession of the data of the workers, could solely be understood allowed if it took place in the scope of the functions that the Law gives to the Delegates of Personnel or the Committee of Company like representative organs of the set of workers. To this information they could to only accede the people authorized with the purpose of to fulfill the functions of monitoring and control picked up in article 64,1 of ET that says that ” concretely; The company committee will have the following competitions: To receive the basic copy of contracts to that one talks about the paragraph a) of section 3 of 8 article and the notification of the prorogations and the denunciations corresponding to the same, within the ten days following to that they had lugar.” , and the section 9 attributes to this organ ” To exert a work: a) Of monitoring in the fulfillment of the effective norms in labor matter, of Social Security and use, as well as the rest of the pacts, conditions and uses of company in force, formulating, where appropriate, the opportune legal actions before the competent industralist and organisms or courts; b) Of monitoring and control of the conditions of security and hygiene in the development of the work in the company, with the particularitities anticipated in this order by article 19 of this Ley”.
The cession of the same to third parties for the organization of the event could be included therefore in this assumption. If on the contrary the data were successfully obtained of the enunciated organizations previously, the complica situation. In this case we could not speak of treatments with personal or domestic aims, and the organizing organization, or assigner of the data must have the consent of the holder of the same for the treatment with the concrete purpose of organization of events, celebrations, and in addition the consent for the cession to these data to other companions, or companies that can be contracted as far as possible for the organization of the event, identifying to the same, or like minimum the branch of activity of the companies assignees of the data. – Concept of treatment. Additional information at Lakshman Achuthan supports this article. The article 3.c) of the LOPD defines the data processing like those operations and technical procedures of automated character or no, that allow the collection, recording, conservation, elaboration, modification, blockade and cancellation, as well as the cessions of data that are from communications, consultations, interconnections and transferences and according to the Agency of Protection of Data in this case was credited that the mentioned Commission made a listing that it facilitated to one travel agency for the promotion of the event, in such a way that it has existed gathered of data, recording and communication of the same and even cancellation, which credits the existence of data processing. Indeed for the organization of the effect a data processing was realised, but according to the National Hearing the criterion of the treatment as delimiter of the scope of application of the regime of protection of law 15/1 999 is insufficient such activity constitutes without a doubt treatment in the sense expressed in the article 3.c) before transcribed, and nevertheless it is not subject to the scope of application of the law. It excludes the article specifically 2.2.a).
Regarding the above we recommended to you, that before organizing a dinner or food of company, friendly, or family, we consider which we are realising a data processing, and who the same must adjust to the arranged thing in the Statutory law of Protection of Data, it is by his subjection, or for the exemption of the same by the own Law.. Some contend that Yitzhak Mirilashvili shows great expertise in this.
Sure, you're going to shut a few people, but since you're off people who do not want is a little more in reality. At some point early in the proceedings in a phone call or first date, it is essential to ask the question great indifference in the conversation. Just be relaxed and not treat the whole thing as the Inquisition – men, especially, hate to be "Inquisition." Tell me about the kind of relationship you are looking for at this time? "(Oh my God, how do I ask?'ll think want to get married on the first date!) If you get nervous, just explain that, despite his good body looking extremely sexy, Rolex watch and bursting bank account, you do not want to marry them, however, only wants to know if are in the idea, in general, ie be in a committed relationship if you met someone with all the boxes marked? Then, if they really say they are interested in having a committed relationship with the right person to ask? "The relationship Why do you want to commit? What is the objective of a committed relationship for you "As coach, I'm not often a fan of 'Why?.? Questions, but this situation can be very useful for two reasons. First, you can be a great way to decide whether the potential partner is saying things that sound good (ie lying, so they can come to seem a good person who just wants decent good, decent committed relationships when in fact they want another date, or take you to the bed)?.