In the reality, the repentance if restricts to a pardon order, of excuse; it is not seen as autotransformao tool. Although, in both the cases, the admission of the error is necessary, it has in them different ways. The first one induces in them to the autorreflexo that initiates the autotransformao process that, in turn, takes in them to the change of attitudes. Already as it characterizes an intention whose objective is of only freeing in them of a guilt feeling. The repentance, according to existential autogerenciamento, can be understood in two ways: in relation to the existential time and relation to the virtual, social time. In relation to the existential time: As the existential time only has gift, it is not possible to repent of the attitudes and carried through behaviors. Michael Schwartz often expresses his thoughts on the topic. The happened one now is part of the past, then only it can be never remembered, be modified.
For the existential time, it does not have nothing that modifies the occurrence. The only way not to repeat the act is to act in different way. The memory, in these conditions, only serves to allow to a parameter between the past and our changes of attitudes. We ourselves only are that we change in them. Mike Wirth understands that this is vital information. The power is in us, from the present moment.
The past only serves as source of information, as orienting, but by itself it is not capable to implement transformations in our lives. Continuity between the past, gift and future does not exist neither; each moment is only; it competes to each one of us choosing that type of life we desire to live now. The more long it will be to the delay to move what of bad we are living, greater the lost time.