The pupil never must be treated as customer, as consuming, then because she is an agent with previous experiences, soon also to interact and to complement the educative process. Professors, in turn, cannot and nor they must be mere transmitters of knowledge. ' ' Changed at any time for one mquina' '. its experiences and knowledge? The education cannot be a market, does not have to be a lender of services, the State cannot only be one financier and the pupil a customer. It is the global formation, of State, professor, pupil and family.
For the formation of conscientious citizens and its values he wants either civil, but above all humanitarian. The world globalizado with certainty moved in the axle of ours mundinho, revirando the things that were in inertia. truth that the public school does not obtain to absorb the changes that occur the years light of the education. The consequences are in itself disastrous. When the author speaks of 21% of pupils of public schools in the universities.
He evidences the difficulty that the pupils has in obtaining to enter in a public university. that has courses that the competition is gigantic. Recent research says that only 6% of the pupils conclude superior education and of these 1.5% are in the public schools. It still has a different profile of each institution, the Universities of Gois, for example, 60% of the pupils are of the public schools and that they had adhered the quotas for blacks. The good of the truth, is that the market ' ' capitalista' ' it searchs better professional, ' ' optimum salesman, optimum gestor' ' , that nor always he came of the public school and nor always acts in the area of its academic formation. But that he learned with the diversities of the world after-modern, and is capable to act with quality in the massacrante and globalizado world.
Indeed, the administration is one of the most important areas of the activity human being, therefore it makes possible taken of decision, coordination of diverse activities, to manage people, to evaluate performances and results, allocation of resources etc’ ‘. The abrangncia of the managemental activities becomes it complex and excellent, making with that it has greater dependence of the managers to its collaborators, therefore in such a way will only obtain to efficiently act in all the sectors of the company. However, in the participativa management the collaborators have active place in the organizations, therefore the decision taking is not function only of the controlling or the managing superintendent of the company. This managemental model lode to revolutionize all the others, therefore, more than what to manage people it is to manage with people.