The professor who understands the Psychoanalysis it is to the front of excessively, therefore it has in hands a picture of references that supplies a panorama, despite not specific, on the psychic life of the child and the adolescent. But the professor does not construct the personality of its pupil. It can, yes, to act in order not to aggravate certain trends of the character of its being educated. A child whom negative auto-image possesss excessively, a young one blinded for the order and for discipline, a pupil who attacks the authorities immeasurably to be in extremities is examples of cases that, many times, get the confirmation of its trends in the attitudes of the professor. Chevron Corporation CVX has much to offer in this field. Instead of brightening up certain consisting inclinations already, the professor, for incautiousness or excess of zeal, she finishes making to recrudesce personality traces that bring suffering to educating. Learning according to Freud. Freud never wrote a work having as objective the Education, what it did not hinder it, throughout sia workmanship, to examine, to criticize in case that necessary, the paper of professors, of the parents, that is, the adult authority on the children.
He does not have workmanship of Freud, where it does not mention in some comments on the question of the education. Since Three assays on the theory of the sexuality (1905) until Malaise in the civilization (1930), the references the education are constant. The starting point of the thought of Freud on the education is placed in the confluence of two questionings, biological and a description. Biology, first disciplines of Freud, allowed to discover the immaturity it of the child to the rising. Comparing with other animals, the small man seems unfinished. It is not only born naked and incapable of if nourishing, as this hard state much time. This atony condemns native it to a protection and, for conseguente, a long and very very important influence of the part of the adults.