It is in this context, which has been acquiring increasingly important study of the University as an organization and the role of the management of businesses in the operation of each of its functions and tasks, has arisen in recent years, a strong debate on the effects that this transformation means for the University, their communities and society. What is questioned is not both the use of administrative techniques in itself, and acceptance of their criteria of efficiency and productivity, to operate the University as if a company already redefined their nature, aims and organization. To put it in other terms, the debate around the entrepreneurialism of the University, is less triple a dispute of which depends on the control and appropriation of knowledge. Referring to the dispute over the identity of the University, as a social institution or commercial organization; to the dispute concerning the determination of the nature of the functions of the University as inalienable public goods or services capable of private appropriation; and, finally, the dispute over the modes of organization of the University as a community of knowledge or bureaucratic Corporation. Says Ibarra, in addition, that is can not doubt that we have a new University that works increasingly as a business, complying with procedures and assessments of all kinds, that lead it along the paths of the control. It does not matter the very high priority that is given as a key to national development in the speeches of rulers and politicians, if her meagre budgets are allocated and all will haggle you; It matters little if she hits the existence of millions of Mexicans who see that happen by far if she promptly serves the needs of corporations in its headlong race for profit. Because, finally, the entrepreneurialism of the University, aside from the recognition of the interests of the nation, has attempted to disrupt social fabrics to bring knowledge to the power of markets, facilitating their appropriation.