It starts saying that she is not for the members of the house of representatives to feel itself constrangidos ahead of the comparison of the wage of it, teacher, with the wage of them, members of the house of representatives. them question if they would obtain ' ' to survive and to keep the standard of living, with this salrio' ' (that in the case of it is of 930 Reals). This already would only be one ' ' it covers in cara' ' of all those that arrotam speeches on the importance of the educational process, in our country. The teacher goes beyond. She says that ' ' who only is in classroom can speak with property on this. It are this, any consideration that is made is for masking a truth that is visible for everybody: the fact of that in no government, no moment, our city, in our state or of our country, the education was one prioridade' '. The veracity of its affirmation can be proven aspects among others, for the low paid wages to the professors, for the low levels of aprendisagem of the pupils, baixssimos for them resulted gotten for our country in ranques world-wide. Therefore and it teacher is not covered of reason.

Mayors, governors and presidents, passing for the councilmen, members of the house of representatives and senators, only have with priority education as something in its eleitoreiros speeches. It are issso is alone talks line. Is inapropriada colloquy, as it affirmed the teacher, therefore only says with property who is of the side of inside: who only is in classroom! Therefore the teacher considers as one absusdo? therefore in fact she is this same? the fact of the authorities to be banalizando the pertaining to school process. E, what it is worse, they want that the professors save the country, save the education, save the children and young and are not alone the authorities.