This article describes the pros and cons specific to SROs in the building business. The advantages of self-construction should include the following: – make a number of construction works without tolerances and licenses (for work not affecting safety ACS) – to reduce the state budget expenditures for the maintenance of the system – a complication of access to building market-by-night companies – expected in the medium term Improving the quality and construction safety; – natural selection builders (in the construction market will remain the strongest and most robust of its members); – improving legal safeguards for consumers of building products. First, the sro in the building can be created in Russia in any amount without limitation. Secondly, issued in any sro in building approvals for construction work, regardless of location finding SROs are valid throughout the country. Third, the sro in the building is not entitled to refuse construction companies in becoming a member of SROs, except as provided by law (see Part 5 of Article 55.6 Town Planning Code). Finally, the fourth, the sro in the building must be placed on the Internet relevant information about themselves and their members (see Article 55.9 of the Town Planning Code).

This is done in order to informing participants of the construction market on the activities of SROs. Its access to the market of construction entrepreneur has to communicate with the legal fate of any of the SROs in the building and its members. Therefore, Entrepreneur’s important to get as much information about the sro, in which he intends to join, including the composition and amount of contributions, as well as the content of potential claims SROs to his business. Price it wrong solutions – the loss of contributions paid, since they are by law after the payments to the sro in the building will not be returned. The minus-home construction include the following: – Increased financial, time and other costs of builders to enter the market of construction works – increase in the cost of building products for consumers – the emergence of the builders of new legal risks (SRO disputes with the risk of loss status of the sro in the building is not the fault of the builders, etc.) – a significant complication of access to the construction market to small and medium-sized businesses – the need to consist of three different SROs in implementing work full cycle (design, survey and construction work) – increasing pressure on the judiciary of the country due to the increase of disputes relating to the activities of SROs.