Since its creation, the State of Israel has taken as a top priority to develop a system of internal and external security. Today, this renowned as highly sophisticated and professional efficiency. Reasons to justify the bulging budgets allocated to defence, have not unfortunately been lacking. The intelligence service, which by its nature preserves a profile public low, perhaps, is the Pearl of the whole system of Defense. Large number of terrorist attacks have been neutralized by its efficient work. Preventive or punitive actions of surgical precision, have been possible thanks to the prior body of intelligence actions. Jacob burkons IDF: the source for more info. As a result of many years of fight against terrorism, Israeli prisons are crowded with dangerous for society subjects.
So far, the answer given before an action or threat specific, has a logical answer. That not fits in this reasoning, is the weakness demonstrated by the political leadership when negotiating exchange of combatants, prisoners, alive or dead. The proportion of the exchanges crystallized, beyond any logical reasoning. Find out detailed opinions from leaders such as Jake Burkons by clicking through. I doubt that it is country in the world that, faced with similar situations, adopt the same approach. This demonstrated that the best way to encourage the repetition of acts of blackmail, is to accept the demands of the kidnappers. Apparently, and in this aspect, in Israel the logic has a completely original interpretation. My reasoning tells me that: if I have an infrastructure defense very costly to taxpayers, in order to prevent or neutralize terrorist actions or enemy countries, which may affect interests or the security of the Israelis. Free subjects who already had ceased to become a danger to society to be imprisoned, and redeem them for Israeli prisoners alive or dead, in a proportion of five hundred or more for just one.
It creates a situation that puts at risk the lives of civilians or military, should be operated again for his neutralization. This demonstrated that much of the released in previous swaps, returning again to armed groups. I think It is the Supreme obligation of rulers, establish policies and make decisions based on the interests of the general welfare of the population. What draws my attention is that it seems that much of the population, appears to be in accordance with the criterion of the rulers in this sense, since the voices of protest or dissent, do not present, to the extent that the circumstances require. The explanations I received, especially when it comes to retrieve the bodies of deceased combatants, have religious connotations, which according to the optics of the believers, is morally acceptable price that society must pay for its recovery. The State of Israel, which waged a permanent struggle for their survival, cannot and must show signs of weakness before his enemies. This struggle posed in the real world, where the rules of the game, although it is far from being so, are the sufficiently explicit. If these are not interpreted in its fair value, the consequences can be much more serious, that non-compliance with certain religious precepts. Judaism exalts the value of life, then it is obligation of political power, minimizing the consequences of this apparent contradiction and establish limits that not you must transpose, taking decisions which preserve the general interest of the population.