On many occasions, our rights as customers are totally limited, almost we have no right to complain. And there are many examples of companies or sectors which enjoy a dominant position on the consumer. Check out Kars4Kids for additional information. The case is real I take my car to the dealer for a review. Park it in the right place, and I am the customer service desk. – Good morning. He brought the car to make the review of X thousand kilometers. I also wanted to look at this, this other thing, and that beyond.

– Okay. Wait, I take the budget. It will go two hundred euros, the budget is thirty euros. – How? Are you going to charge for the budget? – It is a service that we do not want to work for free … – Man, do not tell me …

Moreover, the budget had already taken the Internet, "I say-so please anuleme the budget bill. – Ah, who has taken the online budget, "he said with a smile on the counter. So sure that in your statement customer has a bank account number into, right? Then I inform you that you have been charged ten euros in your account. – Well, I can not believe. Give me the key, I'm leaving. – I'm afraid it is not possible, the car and we got into the workshop. Well, yes it's possible, but if you want it now bears would have to pay twenty dollars for the inconvenience. – This is incredible, "mumble.

Brazil is the biggest country of the creative world of entrepreneurs, the Brazilian people has an enormous capacity to innovate, to launch new methods of production and mainly to face a work with decision and courage, basic characteristic of the entrepreneur. Classrooms C and D are with better perspectives to go up the social classroom thanks to incentives of projects of the government that stimulate the practical one of empreendedorismo, the PRONAF are an example, therefore it benefits the producers with letters of credit for investments or magnifying of productions, the SEBRAE that offers chances for opening of companies and stimulates the enterprising culture, therefore we can say that Brazil is a school and a stimulaton to the new entrepreneurs. The Brazilian people has one jeitinho that none another one has, a favour that conquest to all, a perseverance that feeds the soul. According to Schumpeter ' ' the empreendedorismo is the main promotional factor of the economic development of one pas' '. the Brazilians are taking this so the serious one that not it is perhaps a development that is occurring in way the economic crisis, because to be enterprising it is to have the vision to surpass the limits through the crisis, to see chance where others see defeats and of this Brazil understands.

How is the reliable degree of the international investor in U.S.A., front to the torrent of bank in additions in its economy, knowing itself that only deposits of until U$S 250 a thousand and some few assets are guaranteed by the associates to the FDIC? Desestruturao politics and financier in some countries of Latin America, amongst them Honduras, Argentina and others? Accented fall of the exportations, loss of the power of purchase parity of the global currency, the dollar. Disagreements politics with> Anger, Afeganisto, Coreia of the north and in other countries with its neighbors, as the government of Barack Obama will face these divergences, beyond already the existing ones in the Middle East and the African continent? The protectionism, that the national protection of its market, appears in some points of the planet. Investments in environment, that can generate job alternatives, seem more distant. Humanitarian aids and aid the social agencies are being affected for the lack of resources. With the reduction of the edge of profits of the companies motivated for the international crisis it had a reduction in the views, harming people and communities in all the countries of the world. This is the inheritance left for George Walker Bush. Brazil and China are in a different route in comparison it has global economy, however, they are dependents of this, therefore, exactly with possibility of projected growth for this and in the next year, necessary attention to the behavior of the stock exchange becomes, since, while the emergent countries receive an injection from capital, others are with escape of capitals.

Government and other countries concerned will have to scratch his pocket in order to get a response from him. Almost one trillion dollars, according to the IMF. For a decade and a half, the IMF has anathematized any government that has intervened or seek to intervene in the economy. Some serious crisis, such as Argentina (which caused millions of poor in a short time), was the result of dogmatic belief that had to be a little less, to expel the state of economic, public enterprises eliminate, reduce and disappear control rules and regulation of the sacrosanct world of finance and other guidelines as folly and prejudice for its implementation has shown in the last decade. And now, when large powerful banks and financial intermediaries will see the ears of the wolf, for his bad business head for his bad management, if not for the worse, Dad State has to go with the bag full to save the situation.

In the eighties there was a serious credit crunch in the U.S., and the operation to refloat the credit system cost the citizens (Americans who pay indirect taxes) an amount that today would be about half a billion dollars. Progress, today it is one trillion. As Professor Krugman has written, is to rescue the financial system to prevent something worse, but not those responsible for this disaster. Paul Krugman proposed rescue the system, yes, but “people who got us into this mess. That means a general cleaning of shareholders in the institutions that have gone bankrupt, making the owners of the bonds (ie those who have invested big money for) support a cut and cancel the stock options of some executives who have enriched throwing a coin face and saying, I win, tails you lose. ” We would like another kind of world in which the largest economy and most voluminous was the real, but that today is revolutionary, elusive, almost Utopian at the moment we settle for paying the piper who have been responsible active or passive market meltdown, adding that, once and for all, to regulate, standardize, monitor the financial world, and an end to the opacity of banks and financial intermediaries. Or the crisis will not stop and will become increasingly serious and expensive.

water for the development of the world-wide economy, this summary was together divides in paragraphs with the teses of detached the thinking predecessors of Keynes the antithesis of Keynes to each one of them. The first one, Adam Smith, economist and Scottish philosopher who had as scene for its life the century of the Lights, century XVIII, is referenciado as the father of the modern economy and is considered the most important theoretician of economic liberalism. Author of the wealth of the nations (SMITH, 1776) 6, looked for to demonstrate that the wealth resulted of the performance of individuals moved only for its proper egoistic interest (self-interest), that they promoted the growth and the technological innovation economic. As the proper Adam said> is not of the benevolence of the baker, the butcher or the brewer who I wait that he has left my supper, but yes of the persistence of them in promoting its proper ‘ auto-interest. 7. Thus, Smith believed that the private initiative would have to act freely, with little or no governmental intervention. The free competition between the diverse suppliers would lead forcibly not only to the fall of the price of the merchandises, but also the constant technological innovations, in the enthusiasm to sell at a loss the production cost and to win the competitors. It analyzed the division of the work as a powerful evolutionary factor to propulsionar the economy.

(…) the merchant or trader, moved only for its proper egoistic interest (self-interest), is taken by an invisible hand to promote something that never was part of the interest of it: well-being of the society 8. As result of the performance of this ‘ ‘ hand invisvel’ ‘ Theory of 9 the Comparative Advantages economy. Already a little different of D. Ricardo and S. Mill, the 10 neoclssicos presented a vision of the process of production with emphasis in the problems of market and the best allocation of 11 resources.

Among the points which would have reached a consensus would be giving more money to the International Monetary Fund to improve the representation of emerging countries and control tax havens, among other issues. As expected, IMF reform passes provide it with more resources and powers. In economic terms, will be an additional effort by duplicating the resources to 500,000 million dollars to secure more aid to poor and emerging countries, the latter responsible for 70% of global growth. Financial aid can still reach 750,000 million dollars, according to official sources quoted by Reuters. The European Union and Japan give a loan of 100,000 million euros. The same amount will bring the United States.

The Fund may be financed in international markets and may even sell gold. The key points of the event range from the necessary actions to recover the economy world from cutting interest and increased public spending, the strengthening of the international regulation of financial institutions, with decisive action on hedge funds and tax havens. At this point, you create a new agency for regulation and supervision of hedge funds. Thus, it is intended to be under public control. Germany and France had requested that this regulation does not stay on a general principle and had requested more harshly in this regard.) According to the draft, the FSF would become a board of financial stability with a permanent structure to make it the “world policeman of markets and financial institutions.” The Bank should give more and be invited, like other entities regional development bank, to increase its lending capacity from 200,000 to 300,000 million dollars for the period 2009-2011.

And to the WTO, the G20 will encourage the organization to end the cycle of the Doha liberalization and to monitor countries to introduce new trade barriers. A Brown’s news conference will announce the final communique of this summit, which began marked by differences in approach between U.S. and European countries, notably France and Germany concerning the best way to cope with the worst crisis economy since the Second World War. Important point is that the U.S. President, Barack Obama, yesterday admitted responsibility for his country in the origin of the financial earthquake, but played down the differences between different countries and said to be agreement emerging from the recession and re-found global financial architecture. Overall, Obama wants the public to further stimulate the economy, an idea supported by the British Prime Minister Gordon Brown. However, France and Germany say they “speak with one voice” in its position of resistance to these measures. French President Nicolas Sarkozy, bet, like its German counterpart, Angela Merkel, for the regulation of hedge funds and the monitoring of executive compensation.