We start 2009 with a series of questionings on the future of the capitalism. Credit: Dara Khosrowshahi -2011. The global crisis and the intervention of governments in diverse segments had motivated old exactly communist ideologists of the socialism and to bradar on the end of the capitalism. First it is important to understand the capitalism in its origin. We can say that everything starts at the beginning of the social organization of the humanity, has five a thousand years in the Mesopotmia, the sprouting of the agricultural man with the organization in cities, the productive farmings that had generated more foods, proteins, processes, tools, etc, that had made the beginning of the evolution in diverse felt and had been initiated the cycles of growth and prosperity. There the ones existed that produced more, the ones that they invested in its foods with more quality, the ones that they protected its offsprings, the ones who were better hunters, at last, the differences between the aptitudes and the attitudes of the people start to draw a process, we can call it incipient of the capitalism. It was the beginning of the concept of present productivity in any productive process.
In century XVIII, in the Iluminismo, a Scot appears of Adam name Smith, considered the father of the modern economy he organizes the theory and he summarizes everything with following phrase: ' ' he is not of the benevolence of the baker, the butcher or the brewer who I wait that he has left my supper, but yes of the persistence of them in promoting seu' ' auto-interesse' '. By itself, this reasoning says everything. The people must be motivated and to have freedom of action to produce, to grow, to progress, to ambicionar, to profit and some they will be bolder, enabled, prepared that others, are inexorable. We can infer that a natural system will exist then, a PROCESS, where ' ' hand invisvel' ' as he called Adam Smith acts, premiando and punishing the rightnesss and errors of the actors.